I’m looking for guidance on when to choose backdrilling a through-hole via versus using a blind via in a PCB design. In what scenarios is one preferred over the other?
If you’ve got a high speed signal going through a standard TH via but it only needs to connect a few layers backdrilling is a good way to clean up the extra stub. It helps with signal integrity and is usually more cost effective than redesigning the stackup.
Blind vias are useful when you’re tight on space like under a dense BGA and don’t want the via going through the whole board. They cost more, but sometimes you just need them for routing.
I would say use backdrilling when you’re already using through holes and need to reduce reflections. Use blind vias when you’re doing dense routing or need to save space vertically. But I’m not a designer so someone from our design team might have a different take.
Backdrilling is generally less expensive to fabricate than blind vias since it involves fewer processing steps. However, since you start with a full through-hole via before removing the unused stub, it still requires space through the entire board thickness and additional clearance for the oversized backdrill.
Blind vias, on the other hand, only extend to specific layers, which can free up routing or copper space on other layers. They’re useful in dense designs but are more complex to fabricate and plate, especially for deep or high-aspect-ratio barrels. There’s also a higher risk of trapped chemicals or contaminants during processing, which can affect reliability if not managed carefully.
Backdrilling and blind/buried vias serve different purposes. Backdrilling is mainly used to improve signal integrity by removing unused via stubs, typically from through-hole vias, though in some cases it can be applied to buried vias too.
Blind and buried vias are more about improving layer-to-layer routing density. Since they don’t span the full board thickness, they also help minimize via stubs naturally—but their main benefit is freeing up real estate on inner layers.
From a cost perspective, backdrilling is usually cheaper because it’s done at the end of the drill process, while blind/buried vias require more complex lamination steps and mid-process drilling. That added fabrication effort drives up cost and complexity.
Another lesser-known application for backdrilling is removing the annular ring from one side of a via — not just the stub inside.
I’ve seen this used in a design where the bottom layer is a solid GND plane mounted directly to a heatplate. Signal vias that pass through to lower layers can pose a risk of shorting if their exposed annular rings make contact with the grounded surface. Backdrilling from the bottom side eliminates those exposed rings, helping avoid unintended connections without needing to redesign the via structure.
In backplane designs, backdrilling is often the practical choice over blind or buried vias. These boards typically have long through-hole connectors that span most or all of the board thickness, so using blind or buried vias wouldn’t be feasible or cost-effective. Since the routing is generally point-to-point between connectors, and high-speed signals are involved, backdrilling helps eliminate stubs on unused layers to maintain signal integrity, especially for differential pairs.
Backdrilled vias are typically chosen in high-speed designs where minimizing via stubs is critical for signal integrity. They don’t offer major benefits in other scenarios and do come with added cost, so they’re rarely used unless SI is a concern.
Blind, buried, and microvias are more about improving routing density—especially under BGAs or in HDI layouts. While they can also reduce stub length (particularly microvias), they’re often limited by fabrication constraints like aspect ratio, layer-pair availability, and the number of lamination cycles.
So why not just always use blind or microvias? Backdrilling avoids some of those fabrication limits and can be more practical when you’re already committed to through-hole vias, like in backplanes or connectorized designs, where other via types aren’t viable.