Reliable methods for connecting Flexible PCBs to Rigid boards without connectors

What are the reliable ways to connect a 4-layer flexible PCB to a rigid board without using a connector? In printed circuit board production, are techniques like soldering the flex onto pads and reflowing, ACF bonding, or conductive epoxy commonly used for this kind of rigid-to-flex interface?

1 Like

Yes, connecting a 4-layer flexible PCB to a rigid board without a connector can be done reliably with direct soldering, provided alignment and strain relief are properly handled. One common method involves designing matching and aligned pad arrays on both the rigid PCB and the end of the flexible PCB. These can be arranged so both sets of pads face upward (or one down, depending on the layout), and then manually soldered together.

Typically, the pads are pre-tinned, flux is applied, and then the joint is formed using a soldering iron, often by drag soldering from the rigid board onto the flex pads. While this achieves reliable electrical contact, it’s not a mechanically strong joint. For added durability, many engineers apply flexible adhesive or epoxy to secure the flex to the rigid PCB and relieve strain from the soldered area.

That said, for production builds, it’s worth checking with your PCB assembly house. Some offer more advanced bonding techniques like ACF (Anisotropic Conductive Film) or hot-bar soldering, which provide better process control and mechanical stability. Not every PCB assembly house supports these methods, so early communication is key when planning rigid-to-flex interfaces.

1 Like

Another soldering method involves placing the pads on the bottom side of the flexible PCB (set back slightly from the edge) and on the top side of the rigid PCB. When aligned face-to-face, the solder joint is formed in a QFN-like style, with solder sandwiched between the two sets of pads. This layout requires mirroring the pin order between the flex and rigid boards, as the mating is n-to-1 rather than direct 1-to-1.

To make the connection, you can either tin both pad sets and reflow them together with flux, or use solder paste before applying heat and gentle pressure to form the bond. This approach provides a cleaner profile and can work well when vertical space is tight, but precise alignment is critical. Some PCB assembly houses may also assist with jigs or fixtures to improve consistency and alignment for this method, especially in small production runs.

1 Like

We’ve never had to bond a separate flex to rigid like that. Instead, we’ve always used rigid-flex (or multi-stage rigid-flex-rigid constructions) as a single, continuous stackup during printed circuit board production. It simplifies the mechanical and electrical interface and avoids alignment issues altogether.

That said, if you’re going the soldered route, be extra careful with strain relief. Unsupported solder joints between a rigid and flexible PCB can crack over time, especially with any flexing, vibration, or handling. It’s essential to secure both sides mechanically and electrically, whether through adhesive backing, stiffeners, or a supported enclosure design.

1 Like

The best connection method between a flexible PCB and a rigid board often depends on the application and the environment. For instance, in consumer electronics like smartphones and tablets, flexible PCBs are commonly connected to the main board using FPC connectors due to ease of assembly and repair. On the other hand, in compact applications like wearables, medical devices direct soldering is preferred to eliminate connector bulk and improve reliability.
In these cases, flat-flex cables can be soldered directly to the rigid PCB, either using surface pads or embedded pad arrangements. Careful attention must be given to strain relief and mechanical reinforcement, especially since soldered joints are more prone to stress fractures without proper support. Depending on the production volume and mechanical demands, your PCB assembly house may suggest alternatives like hot bar soldering or conductive adhesives, but these techniques often come with compromises in reworkability and tooling cost.

1 Like